Home > Microsoft Security > Microsoft Security Bulletin Ms02-030

Microsoft Security Bulletin Ms02-030

But if the user then opens a new web browser page and goes to site C, or follows a link from site B to site C, the attacker could not follow So there are a number of limitations to what an attacker could do? MSDE 1.0 is based on SQL Server 7.0; MSDE 2000 is based on SQL Server 2000. However, by default this account has only domain user privileges on the server. have a peek here

However, all versions of IIS through version 5.1 do provide support for HTR, for purposes of backward compatibility.Microsoft has long advocated that customers disable HTR on their web servers, unless there The patch eliminates the vulnerability by instituting proper buffer checking in the affected DBCCs. You should verify that the version of ssnetlib.dll in the \MSSQL\BINN folder for the instance you applied the patch for is: 2000.80.679.0 If the version of the ssnetlib.dll in the \MSSSQL\BINN What issue did you correct in the Standard Security Manager?

Change the operation of the server. Replication is the process by which this happens. By sending a specially chosen request to an affected web server, an attacker could either disrupt web services or gain the ability to run a program on the server.

On IIS 5.0 and 5.1, the service would automatically restart itself. I thought Microsoft's policy was to provide cumulative patches for IIS. Any information the user provided to it could be relayed back to the attacker. Finally, the attacker would need direct connectivity to the server.

A trio of Cross-Site Scripting (CSS) vulnerabilities affecting IIS 4.0, 5.0 and 5.1: one involving the results page that's returned when searching the IIS Help Files, one involving HTTP error pages; Microsoft disclaims all warranties, either express or implied, including the warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. As a result, exploiting the vulnerability on a default IIS 4.0 installation would give the attacker complete control over the server. If the search feature were written to blindly use whatever search phrase it's provided, it would search for the entire string, and create a web page saying "I'm sorry, but I

The URLScan tool's default ruleset would likely limit the attacker to using this vulnerability for denial of service attacks only. How do the patches eliminate this vulnerability? No. If other users visited Web Site A, the correct applet would run.

This would have the effect of terminating any sessions that were in process at the time, and preventing any new ones until the service was restarted. However, in other scenarios, it's impossible to know beforehand how much data will need to be transferred. An attacker could exploit the vulnerability by sending to an affected server a request that would be processed by either of the ISAPI filters mentioned above, and including an URL that Knowledge Base articles can be found on the Microsoft Online Support web site.

A vulnerability associated with scheduled jobs in SQL Server 7.0 and 2000. navigate here SQL Injection Vulnerability in Replication Stored Procedures (CVE-2002-0645): What's the scope of this vulnerability? However, because the information always passes in clear text, it's recognized that sensitive personal information should never be stored in cookies. A vulnerability that could enable an attacker to prevent an FTP server on an IIS 4.0, 5.0, or 5.1 server from providing service.

The attacker would be limited to whatever permissions the user had. What are SQL Server extended stored procedures? Extended stored procedures provide the ability for database designers and administrators to create your their own customized external routines in a programming language such as It cannot be blocked by URLScan. http://justjoomla.net/microsoft-security/microsoft-security-bulletin-jan-2009.html What could this vulnerability enable an attacker to do?

In early 2000, Microsoft and CERT worked together to inform the software industry of the issue and lead an industry-wide response to it. When using SQLXML HTTP functions, the name of the IIS server and the virtual directory must be specified as part of the URL. Exploiting this vulnerability could allow the attacker to escalate privileges to the level of the SQL Server service account.

See ASP.NET Ajax CDN Terms of Use – http://www.asp.net/ajaxlibrary/CDN.ashx. ]]> TechNet Products Products Windows Windows Server System Center Browser

If you are running Windows NT 4.0, Windows 2000, or Windows XP, type "cmd" (without the quotes), then hit the enter key. File includes provide a way to do this. What vulnerabilities does this patch eliminate? This is a privilege elevation vulnerability. For instance, DBCCs are available to defragment databases, repair minor errors, show usage statistics, and so forth.

The patch does not supersede any previously released patches for MDAC or OLAP under SQL Server 2000. What would this vulnerability enable an attacker to do? Security Advisories and Bulletins Security Bulletins 2002 2002 MS02-018 MS02-018 MS02-018 MS02-072 MS02-071 MS02-070 MS02-069 MS02-068 MS02-067 MS02-066 MS02-065 MS02-064 MS02-063 MS02-062 MS02-061 MS02-060 MS02-059 MS02-058 MS02-057 MS02-056 MS02-055 MS02-054 MS02-053 this contact form CODEBASE Spoofing Vulnerabilities (CAN-2002-1258): What's the scope of these vulnerabilities?

By sending a series of requests that simply overran the buffer with random data, the attacker could cause the service to fail. If the user were to subsequently return directly to site B at a later stage, an attacker could not "spy" on this session. What's the scope of this vulnerability? This is a buffer overrun vulnerability. The component containing the vulnerability is removed by default by the IIS Lockdown Tool.

The patch eliminates the arithmetic error that causes the vulnerability. What causes the vulnerability? By divulging the directory, the VM would also have divulged the "John" user name. The vulnerability results because the Java Database Connectivity APIs don't properly regulate who can call them, and will service requests from untrusted Java applets.